Insight

The Sand Replacement Test: How Field Density and Compaction Are Checked on Site

person Author: Geotechnical Division
calendar_today Published: SEPTEMBER 26, 2026
The Sand Replacement Test: How Field Density and Compaction Are Checked on Site

Compaction is what turns loose fill into a platform that can carry a road, a building slab, or a drain. It is also one of the easiest things on a site to get wrong without anyone noticing: a layer that looks and feels firm under a roller may still be too loose, and the settlement shows up months later as cracked pavement or a sunken floor. The sand replacement test is the standard way to check, layer by layer, that compaction on site has actually reached the density the design assumes.

The Principle

Density is mass divided by volume. Weighing soil is easy. The hard part on site is measuring the volume of the soil you removed. The sand replacement method solves this by digging a small hole, keeping every bit of soil taken out of it, and then filling the hole with a clean, uniform sand whose density is already known. The mass of sand needed to fill the hole gives its volume.

The method is set out in BS 1377-9, the in-situ tests part of the British Standard for soil testing, which is widely used in Malaysia. It includes a small pouring cylinder and a large pouring cylinder version, with the larger one used for coarser-grained material.

The Procedure

  1. Calibrate the sand. Before going to site, the sand's bulk density and the mass of sand that fills the cone of the pouring cylinder are determined in the laboratory.
  2. Prepare the surface. A flat, level area of the compacted layer is trimmed and a metal tray with a central hole is placed on it.
  3. Excavate the hole. Soil is dug out through the tray hole to the required depth and every particle is collected and weighed.
  4. Take a moisture sample. Part of the excavated soil is sealed and sent for moisture content determination.
  5. Pour the sand. The pouring cylinder is placed over the hole and sand is allowed to run in until it stops. The cylinder is weighed again to find how much sand was used.
  6. Calculate. The volume of the hole comes from the mass of sand it took, minus the sand held in the cone.

From Bulk Density to Relative Compaction

  • Bulk density is the mass of wet soil removed divided by the volume of the hole.
  • Dry density removes the water: bulk density divided by (1 + moisture content).
  • Relative compaction compares the field dry density with the maximum dry density from a laboratory compaction test on the same material, expressed as a percentage.

Earthworks and pavement specifications set a minimum relative compaction for each layer, often with a moisture content range as well. A test that falls short means the layer is rerolled, or reworked and recompacted, before the next layer can go on top.

Common Sources of Error

  • Loose soil left in the hole, or soil lost during excavation, understates the mass and gives a falsely low density.
  • Vibration nearby from rollers or trucks while the sand is running can compact the sand in the hole and distort the volume.
  • Damp or contaminated sand no longer matches its calibrated density. The sand needs to be kept dry and recalibrated regularly.
  • Uneven surface under the tray lets sand spill into gaps outside the hole.
  • Wrong reference density: comparing field results against a laboratory maximum dry density for a different borrow source or material type makes the percentage meaningless.

Why It Is Still Used

Faster methods exist, such as nuclear density gauges, but the sand replacement test needs no radioactive source or licence, is simple to audit, and produces a physical sample for moisture testing. That keeps it a common acceptance test for embankments, subgrade, and road base layers.

Note: Required relative compaction, layer thickness, and testing frequency are set by the project specification. Results should be reviewed by the responsible engineer together with the laboratory compaction test on the same material.

Related Articles

Bitumen Penetration and Softening Point Tests: How Paving Binder Is Graded
Insight
SEPTEMBER 27, 2026

Bitumen Penetration and Softening Point Tests: How Paving Binder Is Graded

What the needle penetration and ring-and-ball softening point tests measure, how penetration grades such as 60-70 and 80-100 are defined, and why binder consistency matters in Sarawak's climate.

Read Article arrow_right_alt
The Clegg Impact Test: A Quick Stiffness Check for Compacted Soils and Pavement Layers
Insight
SEPTEMBER 27, 2026

The Clegg Impact Test: A Quick Stiffness Check for Compacted Soils and Pavement Layers

What the Clegg hammer measures, how an Impact Value is obtained on site, where it fits alongside density and CBR testing, and what can skew the readings.

Read Article arrow_right_alt
The Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) Test: Profiling Subgrade Strength With Depth
Insight
SEPTEMBER 27, 2026

The Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) Test: Profiling Subgrade Strength With Depth

How the dynamic cone penetrometer gives a continuous strength profile of pavement layers and subgrade, how penetration rate relates to in-situ CBR, and where the DCP fits compared with the Mackintosh probe.

Read Article arrow_right_alt